Ex parte NAITO - Page 3




                Appeal No. 95-2898                                                                                                            
                Application 08/053,193                                                                                                        



                Kikuchi                                   4,944,982                 July 31, 1990                                             
                Azuma    2                                1-107388                  Apr. 25, 1989                                             
                (Japanese Kokai)                                                                                                              


                                 Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                                             
                unpatentable over Kikuchi and Azuma.  Claims 5, 10 and 11 stand                                                               
                rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Kikuchi and                                                               
                Ogusu.    3                                                                                                                   
                                 Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or the                                                        
                Examiner, we make reference to the briefs  and the answer for the    4                                                        
                details thereof.                                                                                                              




                         2Our understanding of this reference is based on an English                                                          
                translation thereof prepared by the United States Patent and                                                                  
                Trademark Office.  A copy of that translation is attached hereto.                                                             

                         3The final rejection of claims 5, 10 and 11 under 35 U.S.C.                                                          
                102 has been withdrawn by the examiner and forms no part of the                                                               
                appeal herein.                                                                                                                

                         4Appellants filed an appeal brief on October 27, 1994.  We                                                           
                will refer to this appeal brief as simply the brief.   Appellants                                                             
                filed a reply appeal brief on March 22, 1995.  We will refer to                                                               
                this reply appeal brief as the reply brief.  The Examiner stated                                                              
                in the Examiner’s letter mailed April 3, 1995 that the reply                                                                  
                brief has been entered and considered but no further response by                                                              
                the Examiner is deemed necessary.                                                                                             
                                                                      3                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007