Appeal No. 95-2898 Application 08/053,193 center hole (See Figure 7 and column 5, lines 47-53) and center core (See Figure 5) having all of the limitations as recited in Appellants’ claim 1 except for "claws formed in said wall portion which project from said outside peripheral surface of said cylindrical wall and which engage an upper surface of said optical disc so as to clamp said optical disk between said stopper ledge and said claws." In particular, we find that Kikuchi teaches a center core, shown as a hub 50 in Figure 5, which fits into said center hole of said optical disk. We find that Kikuchi teaches a center core having a bottom disk- portion (the portion of flange 52 that supports boss 51 shown in Figure 5) a cylindrical wall (shown as outer wall 55 in Figure 5) extending from the bottom disk-portion and a stopper ledge (shown as the portion of flange 52 that does not support boss 51 in Figure 5) projecting outwardly from an outside peripheral surface of said cylindrical wall and abutting on a lower surface of the optical disk as set forth in Appellants' claim 1. Furthermore, we find that Kikuchi teaches in Figure 5 and column 5, lines 26 and 27, a plurality of slits 59 formed in the cylindrical wall as recited in Appellants’ claim 1. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007