Appeal No. 95-3026 Application No. 07/945,061 (difference) between two images.” Gonzalez describes (page 319) a “root-mean-square (rms) error between an input and output image.” Appellants argue throughout the brief that the applied references neither teach nor would they have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art producing separate arrays of pixels representing the same specimen at two different times for before and after abrasion analysis. We agree. Accordingly, the obviousness rejection is reversed. DECISION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007