THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DUANE ROTH and LARRY M. MORRISON
__________
Appeal No. 95-3071
Application No. 08/028,0131
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before THOMAS, KRASS and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9 through 11, 14 and 15. Claims 3, 5,
8, 12, 13 and 16 have been indicated by the examiner as being
directed to allowable subject matter.
1Application for patent filed March 8, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007