Ex parte ROTH et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 95-3071                                                          
          Application No. 08/028,013                                                  


          disclose or suggest the centering of a moving target, as                    
          discussed supra.                                                            
               We have sustained the rejection of claim 9 under 35                    
          U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph but we have not sustained the                  
          rejections based on prior art.                                              
               Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part.              


























                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007