THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte STANLEY E. KAY
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3346
Application 07/953,3201
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, KRASS and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 5-27, all the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to a method of transmitting messages. Claims 5 and 12 are illustrative
and read as follows:
1Application for patent filed September 25, 1992. According to appellant, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/622,243, filed December 6, 1990.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007