Appeal No. 95-3346
Application 07/953,320
claim 11. In view of the above discussion, it is clear that the examiner has not made out a prima facie
case of obviousness utilizing Nazarenko and the art with which it has been combined, and we will not
sustain the rejections of claims 11-27.
Summary
In summary:
a) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 5, 6 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Lee in view of French is affirmed.
b) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 7-9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable
over Lee in view of French is reversed.
c) the decision of the examiner to reject claim 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over
Lee in view of French and Nazarenko is reversed.
d) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 12, 13, 15, 16, and 18-27 under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as unpatentable over Lee, McRae and Nazarenko is reversed.
e) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 14 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Lee, McRae, Nazarenko and French is reversed.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007