THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MASAHIRO MURAKAMI
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3405
Application 08/077,5051
______________
HEARD: May 4, 1998
_______________
Before KRASS, BARRETT and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3 and 5-12. Claims 2 and
4 have been canceled. No claim has been allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
Steeves et al. (Steeves) 5,075,874 Dec. 24, 1991
Nelson 5,025,398 Jun. 18, 1991
Application for patent filed June 17, 1993. According to appellant,1
this application is a continuation of application 07/794,047, filed November
19, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007