THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JAMES W. PROSCIA, KEITH B. WILLIAMS and GENE P. RECK ____________ Appeal No. 95-3462 Application No. 08/083,2061 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before CAROFF, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges. CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection of claims 1-18, all the claims pending in the involved application. 1Application for patent filed June 24, 1993. According to the appellants, the application is a continuation of Application No. 07/806,174, filed December 13, 1991.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007