Ex parte PROSCIA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-3462                                                          
          Application No. 08/083,206                                                  


               The claims on appeal are directed to a chemical vapor                  
          deposition (CVD) process involving the formation of a metal                 
          nitride.                                                                    
               Appellants indicate on page 3 of their appeal brief that               
          the patentability of the appealed claims is not argued                      
          separately.  Accordingly, all of the claims stand or fall with              
          representative claim 1 which reads as follows:                              
               1.  A chemical vapor deposition process for preparing a                
          metal nitride, comprising contacting a metal halide with an                 
          amine at a temperature sufficient to form a metal nitride.                  
               The examiner relies upon the following four prior art                  
          references of record to support multiple rejections of the                  
          claims:                                                                     
          Bohg et al. (Bohg)            4,091,169                May  23,             
          1978                                                                        
          Gordon                        4,535,000                Aug. 13,             
          1985                                                                        
          Goodman et al. (Goodman)           4,946,712                Aug.            
          7, 1990                                                                     
          Matsumura                62-70208 (Japan) Mar. 31,                          
          1987                                                                        
               The following rejections constitute the basis for this                 
          appeal:                                                                     
                I. Claims 1-3, 5 and 7-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Matsumura.                                 
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007