Appeal No. 95-3673
Application 07/935,762
In each of these locations of Bruggemann it appears that
there is no repetitive action of testing the segmented displays
of liquid crystal displays in a manner required at the end of
representative claim 1 on appeal. It appears to us that the
intent of the very last portion of the final test phase is to
test each of the speedometer, odometer and rpm meter once only.
Column 6, lines 20 through 25. There is no positive teaching and
certainly no suggestion that this portion of the testing action
within Bruggemann would be repeated in any manner let alone
repeated in a manner corresponding to a particular self test as
required at the end of representative independent claim 1 on
appeal.
Furthermore, and significantly to us, this claim requires
that the testing represented by the sweeping action of the
mechanical meter movement claimed is to represent the testing
result of other recited elements, namely, the recited electronic
circuit means. Bruggemann’s teachings as to the noted feature
identified at 3 locations in Bruggemann and earlier by us in this
opinion only relate to testing the respective speedometer,
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007