Ex parte NAKAGAWA - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-3889                                                          
          Application 08/070,296                                                      


          a multi-port RAM for storing data used during execution of                  
          the operation instructions;                                                 
          a sequence operation processor, coupled to said multi-port                  
          RAM, for executing the operation instructions, said sequence                
          operation processor including a comparator for comparing a first            
          designated address of said multi-port RAM in a first operation              
          instruction with a second designated address of said multi-port             
          RAM in a second, subsequent operation instruction, and for                  
          generating a comparison signal indicating a result of said                  
          comparison, the second designated address of said multi-port RAM            
          being read in response to said generated comparison signal                  
          indicating that said first and second designated addresses are not          
          equal to each other, wherein said sequence operation processor              
          simultaneously writes data to the first designated address of the           
          multi-port RAM and reads data from the second designated address            
          of the multi-port RAM when said generated comparison signal                 
          indicates that said first and second designated addresses are not           
          equal to each other.                                                        

          The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                   
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Loo                          4,639,866                  Jan. 27,            
          1987                                                                        
          Runaldue                     5,062,081                  Oct. 29,            
          1991                                                                        
          Appellant’s prior art admissions on pages 1-5 of the                        
          specification.                                                              
          Claims 1-3, 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                 
          as anticipated by Loo.                                                      


                                            2                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007