Appeal No. 95-3889
Application 08/070,296
been shown that the above would have involved obvious
modifications of the combined prior art.
Such being the case, a prima facie case of obviousness has not
been established, and we will not sustain the rejection of claims
7, 8 and 11. In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1266, 23 USPQ2d 1780,
1783-84 (Fed.
Cir. 1992).
REVERSED
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007