Appeal No. 95-3919
Application No. 07/907,934
The obviousness rejection of claim 134 is reversed
because Katznelson does not count requests for a product in
order to compute an amount to be billed for use of a product
on CD-ROM.
The obviousness rejection of claim 135 is sustained
because the terminal 10 in Katznelson obtains the address/unit
ID of terminal 11, without any input from terminal 11, when
the encrypted file key 13 and the authenticated credit data 14
are sent to terminal 11.
The obviousness rejection of claim 136 is reversed
because terminal 11 in Katznelson does not resend a request if
a reply is not received from terminal 10 “within a
predetermined period of time after” the request is sent.
9
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007