Appeal No. 95-3919
Application No. 07/907,934
The obviousness rejection of claims 157 and 158 is
reversed because terminal 11 in Katznelson does not generate
requests “at regular time intervals.”
The obviousness rejection of claims 159 through 168 is
reversed because terminal 11 in Katznelson does not send a
request to terminal 10 while a product from the CD-ROM “is in
use.”
For all of the reasons expressed supra in connection with
claim 132, the obviousness rejection of claim 169 is
sustained.
The obviousness rejection of claim 170 is reversed
because terminal 11 in Katznelson does not send a request “at
regular time intervals during use” of a product on CD-ROM.
The obviousness rejection of claim 171 is sustained
because a particular data product on the CD-ROM is identified
in the request.
For all of the reasons expressed supra in connection with
claim 135, the obviousness rejection of claim 172 is
sustained.
For all of the reasons expressed supra in connection with
claim 136, the obviousness rejection of claim 173 is reversed.
12
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007