Appeal No. 95-3919
Application No. 07/907,934
because appellant has grouped this claim with claim 201
(Brief, page 4).
For all of the reasons expressed supra in connection with
claim 150, the obviousness rejection of claims 215 and 216 is
reversed.
The obviousness rejection of claims 217 and 218 is
reversed because terminal 11 in Katznelson does not transmit
requests “at
18
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007