THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JABEZ McCLELLAND
________________
Appeal No. 95-3942
Application No. 08/008,9761
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, SCHAFER and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claim 6.
Claims 2-5, the other claims remaining in the present
application, have been objected to by the examiner as being
allowable but dependent upon the rejected claim. Appealed claim
6 reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed January 26, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007