Ex parte MCCLELLAND - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                                        Paper No. 17                          


                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                         ________________                                                                     
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                         ________________                                                                     
                                                  Ex parte JABEZ McCLELLAND                                                                   
                                                         ________________                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 95-3942                                                                    
                                                Application No. 08/008,9761                                                                   
                                                         ________________                                                                     
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                         ________________                                                                     

                Before KIMLIN, SCHAFER and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                               
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                          


                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is an appeal from the final rejection of claim 6.                                                               
                Claims 2-5, the other claims remaining in the present                                                                         
                application, have been objected to by the examiner as being                                                                   
                allowable but dependent upon the rejected claim.  Appealed claim                                                              
                6 reads as follows:                                                                                                           


                         1Application for patent filed January 26, 1993.                                                                      
                                                                    -1-                                                                       




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007