THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in
a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ROBERT B. RHODES, HARVEY E. ATWOOD
and JOHN E. GORMAN
________________
Appeal No. 95-3976
Application 08/164,7331
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
1Application for patent filed December 7, 1993. According to appellants, the application is a division of
Application 08/083,857, filed June 25, 1993, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 07/790,610, filed
November 8, 1991, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007