Ex parte RHODES et al. - Page 4




                 Appeal No. 95-3976                                                                                                               
                 Application 08/164,733                                                                                                           


                 star polymer as a “solid crumb”; and (iii) blending the star polymer with a base oil.  The claimed process                       

                 further limits the average molecular weight of polyisoprene to between 30,000 and 60,000 and the average                         

                 molecular weight of polystyrene to be from 3,000 to 4,000.  The core of the star polymer is the                                  

                 polyalkylene coupling agent while the polymeric arms of the star are formed by the poly(isoprene/styrene)                        

                 block copolymer.                                                                                                                 

                          The examiner determined that the claimed process was anticipated by Example 13 of Eckert under                          

                 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).  Eckert discloses preparing a living poly(isoprene/styrene) block copolymer wherein                          

                 the average molecular weight of polyisoprene is 41,000 and the average molecular weight of polystyrene                           
                 is 4,000.   The examiner found that all elements of the claimed invention were disclosed by Eckert except2                                                                                                                       

                 for forming a “solid crumb.”  The examiner held that the recovery of the star polymer as a “solid crumb”                         

                 would be inherent from the teachings of Eckert.  Appellants argue that Example 13 of Eckert describes a                          

                 star polymer having the styrene blocks next to the core of the star polymers (i.e. at the inner end of the                       

                 polymeric arms) whereas the claimed composition requires the styrene blocks to be away from the core                             

                 at the outer end of the polymeric arms.  Appellants further argue that “Eckert at best suggests recovering                       

                 polymers having small terminal styrene blocks as a solid crumb and Applicants are not aware of precedent                         

                 holding that patentability can be denied based upon the inherent result of a suggested invention” (reply brief:                  


                          The example does not explicitly disclose the average molecular weight for polystyrene, but it does disclose2                                                                                                                      
                 the average  molecular  weight  of  polyisoprene  as  being  41,000  and  the  average  molecular  weight  of  the               
                 polyisoprene/polystyrene block copolymer as being 45,000.  It is reasonable to presume that the difference (45,000 -             
                 41,000) would be the molecular weight of polystyrene in the block copolymer.                                                     
                                                                       -4-                                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007