Ex parte BERGER - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-4134                                                          
          Application 08/099,090                                                      


          and the like, and in particular to inserts which can be placed              
          in a standard pad holder designed to hold a cardboard-backed                
          pad of paper without interfering with use of the pad and other              
          standard features of the pad holder" (specification, page 1).               
          More specifically, on page 2 of the specification, it is noted              
          that                                                                        
               "[t]here is a need for a pad holder insert which can                   
               provide additional storage in a typical pad holder                     
               so as to enable the user to store and carry                            
               additional items in the pad holder without the need                    
               to resort to a portfolio or briefcase.  Such an                        
               insert should prefer-ably be available in a number                     
               of different configura-tions to hold a variety of                      
               different items, such as computer diskettes, a                         
               calculator, keys and coins, and so forth. It is                        
               desirable that such an insert be easily inserted and                   
               that it not interfere with the use of the pad of                       
               paper, inside flap pocket, and other standard                          
               features of the pad holder.  It is also desirable                      
               that such an insert be easily removable for those                      
               times when it is not needed, or so that it can be                      
               replaced with a different insert adapted to hold                       
               different items as the user may desire.                                

               Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal              
          and a copy of that claim may be found in the Appendix to                    
          appellant's brief.                                                          

          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                       
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007