THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SCOTT H. PRENGLE and
ROBERT H. EKLUND
__________
Appeal No. 95-4174
Application 08/165,5531
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and KRASS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
1Application for patent filed December 10, 1993.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/895,535, filed June 8, 1992; which is a
division of Application 07/785,174, filed October 29, 1991,
now Patent No. 5,171,702; which is a continuation of
Application 07/383,960, filed July 21, 1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007