Ex parte BORCEA et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)               
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                  
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                          
                                                             Paper No. 25              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                    _____________                                      
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                      
                   Ex parte NICKY BORCEA and ALEXANDRU D. IONESCU                      
                                    _____________                                      
                                  Appeal No. 95-4336                                   
                               Application 08/057,8981                                 
                                    ______________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                     

          Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                      
          CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claim 16,                 
          the only claim remaining in the application.                                 
               Claim 16 is drawn to an electromagnetic servovalve, and                 
          is reproduced in the Appendix to appellants' Supplemental                    


               Application for patent filed May 7, 1993.1                                                                      
                                          1                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007