Ex parte BORCEA et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 95-4336                                                          
          Application 08/057,898                                                      


          disclosure, we consider that it would have been obvious to one              
          of ordinary skill in the art to utilize a centrally-located                 
          magnet in the electromagnetic actuator portion of the                       
          Montelius valve instead of the annular magnet arrangement                   
          disclosed by Montelius, this being simply the use of one known              
          arrangement for the electromagnetic actuator of a spool valve               
          in place of another.                                                        
               In reaching our determination of obviousness, we have                  
          taken into account the (undated) declaration of applicant                   
          Nicky Borcea, submitted with the Amendment and Reply filed on               
          May 23, 1994.   According to the accompanying remarks, this6                                                              
          declaration shows the commercial success of the claimed                     
          invention.                                                                  


               The declaration states, inter alia, that Robohand, Inc.,               
          of which Mr. Borcea is president, began manufacturing the                   
          claimed                                                                     
          "voice coil" servovalve in 1993; that since January 1, 1994,                

               The declaration was not considered with regard to the final rejection,6                                                                     
          since commercial success is not relevant to a rejection under 35 USC § 102. 
          In re Paulsen, 30 F.3d 1475, 1482 n.11, 31 USPQ2d 1671, 1676 n. 11 (Fed. Cir.
          1994).                                                                      
                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007