Ex parte BORCEA et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 95-4336                                                          
          Application 08/057,898                                                      


          Conclusion                                                                  
               The examiner's decision to reject claim 16 is reversed.                
          Claim 16 is rejected pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) as being                 
          unpatentable (1) for failing to comply with 35 USC § 112,                   
          second paragraph, and (2) under 35 USC § 103.                               
               This decision contains new grounds of rejection pursuant               
          to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final               
          rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203              
          Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).                 
          37 CFR    § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection              
          shall not be considered final for purposes of judicial                      
          review.”                                                                    
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                    
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise              
          one of the following two options with respect to the new                    
          grounds of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings                    
          (§ 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                                     
                    (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                        
               claims so rejected or a showing of facts relating to                   
               the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                   
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                    
                    (2) Request that the application be reheard                       
                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007