Appeal No. 95-4373
Application 07/917,108
The reference relied on by the Examiner is as follows:
Tzou 4,698,689 Oct. 06, 1987
This specification is objected to under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph, as the specification, as originally filed, does
not provide support for the invention as is now claimed. Claims
10 through 19 stand rejected under Claims 1 through 4 and 9
through 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,
for not having support from the specification, as originally
filed. Claims 10 through 12 and 15 through 19 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Tzou. Claims 13
and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Tzou. On page 2 of the Examiner’s answer, the Examiner
states that the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 has been
withdrawn.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007