Appeal No. 95-4373
Application 07/917,108
one original image to the next when properly taking into account
that the claims require the original images of the first group
that are assigned a low threshold value to alternate with the
original images of the second group that are assigned a high
threshold value. Upon a careful review of Tzou, we fail to find
that Tzou teaches this process. Therefore, we find that Tzou
fails to teach all of the limitations of claims 10 through 12 and
15 through 19, and thereby the claims are not anticipated by
Tzou.
In regard to the rejection of claim 13 and 14 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Tzou, we note that the
Examiner is relying on the above argument. Therefore, we will
not sustain this rejection as well for the same reasons as above.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner
rejecting claims 10 through 19 is reversed.
REVERSED
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007