THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD D. HEIN and WALTER J. KELLY
____________
Appeal No. 95-4486
Application No. 08/158,7131
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 6 through 12, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed November 24, 1993. According
to the appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/874,930, filed April 28, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007