THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 33 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte YUKIO SHIMAZAKI, MIYUKI KAWASHIMA, MASHAIKO ISHIBASHI, RYO TANAKA, KIYOSHI SAKAI and HISAHIRO ISHIWARI __________ Appeal No. 95-4691 Application 08/021,6521 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges. WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-17, which are all of the claims in the application. We affirm. Application for patent filed February 22, 1993. According to appellants the application is a continuation of1 Application 07/580,913, filed September 12, 1990, now abandoned. -1-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007