Ex parte IYENGAR et al. - Page 4






                           Appeal No. 95-4735                                                                                                                                                                                           
                           Application 07/826,171                                                                                                                                                                                       



                           1574, 39 USPQ2d 1524, 1526 (Fed. Cir.  1996); In re Rosen, 673 F.2d 388, 391, 213 USPQ 347, 350                                                                                                              

                           (CCPA 1982). The examiner’s basic reference is EKCO.  EKCO discloses a three dimensional top view                                                                                                            

                           of a shallow baking pan (see Fig. IV below) which has the same general appearance to Figs. 2 and 3,                                                                                                          

                           combined, of the top view of appellants’ overall design (see Fig. III below).                                                                                                                                
























                                        Fig. III: top and side views of appellants’ pan                                                 Fig. IV: the EKCO pan2                                                                          







                                        2 The lower left portion of the pan was not illustrated in the reference because the reference gave a series of                                                                                 
                           pictures cascading from the top of the page and the lower left corner of the pan was overlapped by the next succeeding                                                                                       
                           picture in the cascade.  In reproducing the illustration, the overlapping picture was deleted.  We find that the partial                                                                                     
                           portion of the pan illustrated in EKCO is sufficiently clear to show that the top of the pan is ornamentally the same as                                                                                     
                           appellant’s top view.                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                  4                                                                                                                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007