Appeal No. 95-4735 Application 07/826,171 improperly focused on Finely’s concept, rather than upon the actual visual appearance which would be suggested thereby. In re Harvey, 12 F.3d 1061, 1064, 29 USPQ2d 1206, 1208 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED JAMES M. MEISTER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) CAMERON WEIFFENBACH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007