THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ALEXANDER J. LIMBERIS
JOANNE F. OTTNEY and
JOSEPH W. BRYAN
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4736
Application 08/084,8011
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-39, all the claims pending in the
application.
The invention pertains to apparatus for replacing segments of instructions for a processor.
Claims 1 and 14 are illustrative and read as follows:
1Application for patent filed June 29, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007