Ex parte LIMBERIS et al. - Page 1




                                           THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                    
                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                                                                     
                    publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                            
                                                                                                                        Paper No. 18                                       

                                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                      
                                                                          _____________                                                                                    
                                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                     
                                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                      
                                                                          _____________                                                                                    
                                                           Ex parte ALEXANDER J. LIMBERIS                                                                                  
                                                                  JOANNE F. OTTNEY and                                                                                     
                                                                      JOSEPH W. BRYAN                                                                                      
                                                                          _____________                                                                                    
                                                                       Appeal No. 95-4736                                                                                  
                                                                     Application 08/084,8011                                                                               
                                                                         ______________                                                                                    
                                                                             ON BRIEF                                                                                      
                                                                         _______________                                                                                   
                    Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                  
                    URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                

                                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                     
                              This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-39, all the claims pending in the                                                        
                    application.                                                                                                                                           
                              The invention pertains to apparatus for replacing segments of instructions for a processor.                                                  
                    Claims 1 and 14 are illustrative and read as follows:                                                                                                  

                              1Application for patent filed June 29, 1993.                                                                                                 
                                                                                    1                                                                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007