Paper No. 18
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MICHAEL STEINMETZ
______________
Appeal No. 95-4846
Application 08/023,5921
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and WALTZ, Administrative
Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 14 through 16, as amended after the final
rejection. The amendment after final rejection dated March 27,
1995 (Paper No. 10) was refused entry by the examiner while the
Application for patent filed February 26, 1993. According to1
applicant, this application is a division of Application 07/642,522,
filed January 17, 1991, now Patent No. 5,201,635 issued April 13, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007