THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte PAUL H. HORTON
________________
Appeal No. 95-4852
Application 08/224,0901
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before COHEN, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 20 through
22. Claims 2 through 6, 8 through 12 and 15 through 19 stand2
allowed. Claim 23 has been indicated as containing allowable
subject matter but stands objected to as depending from a
1Application for patent filed April 5, 1994. According to
appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
08/017,549, filed February 16, 1993, now abandoned.
2Claim 20 has been amended subsequent to final rejection.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007