Ex parte HORTON - Page 3




                Appeal No. 95-4852                                                                                                            
                Application 08/224,090                                                                                                        


                         first means in the housing for dispensing the insulation                                                             
                material and conveying the insulation material in one direction                                                               
                in the housing toward the exit opening; and                                                                                   
                         second means in the housing located above the first means                                                            
                for dispensing the insulation material and conveying the                                                                      
                insulation material in a direction opposite to said one direction                                                             
                in the housing.                                                                                                               
                         The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                                                            
                anticipation and obviousness are:                                                                                             
                Morris                                    1,413,345                        Apr. 18, 1922                                      
                Woten                                     3,529,870                        Sept. 22, 1970                                     
                         The claims on appeal stand rejected as follows:                                                                      
                         a) claims 20 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                                                                
                anticipated by Woten; and                                                                                                     
                         b) claim 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                                                         
                Woten in view of Morris.3                                                                                                     
                         Reference is made to the appellant’s brief (Paper No. 13)                                                            
                and to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 14) for the respective                                                                
                positions of the appellant and the examiner with regard to the                                                                
                propriety of these rejections.                                                                                                





                         3The examiner has withdrawn the 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                                                              
                paragraph, rejection of claims 20 through 22 which was set forth                                                              
                in the final rejection (see the advisory action dated July 1,                                                                 
                1994, Paper No. 11)                                                                                                           
                                                                    -3-                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007