Appeal No. 95-4929 Application 08/093,790 Upon our review of Takenaka 305, we fail to find that Takenaka 305 teaches "an upper electrode having first and second portions ... said second portion extending to and being in direct contact with said source electrode" as recited in Appellants' claim 4. Takenaka 305 teaches in column 1, lines 55-64, that the dielectric 1108 is sandwiched between two electrodes 1107 and 1109 to create a ferroelectric capacitor. Takenaka 305 further teaches in column 1, lines 55-64, that the source is shown as element 1103. Figure 11 shows that the electrode 1109 is the top electrode. Figure 11 further shows that this electrode is not in direct contact with the source 1103. Takenaka 305 teaches in column 1, lines 55-64, that the source is contact with an aluminum connection electrode 1111 and the cell is completed by a second inter-layer insulating film 1110 and this aluminum connection electrode 1111. Furthermore, we fail to find in reason to modify Takenaka 049 to obtain Appellant's invention. The Federal Circuit states that "[t]he mere fact that the prior art may be modified in the manner suggested by the Examiner does not make the modification 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007