THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 50
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MASAKI TSUKUDE,
KAZUTAMI ARIMOTO
KAZUYASU FUJISHIMA,
YOSHIO MATSUDA
and TSUKASA OOISHI
_____________
Appeal No. 95-5032
Application 08/189,2761
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's rejection
1Application for patent filed January 31, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/938,582, filed September 2, 1992, now abandoned; which is a
continuation of Application 07/735,684, filed July 29, 1991, now abandoned; which is a continuation
of Application 07/441,588, filed November 27, 1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007