THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 44
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte A. RICHARD CHAMBERLIN, RICHARD J. BRIDGES,
CARL W. COTMAN and MARK S. STANLEY
__________
Appeal No. 96-0009
Application 08/104,4171
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, KIMLIN, and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1-4 and 22-24, which are all of the claims remaining in
1Application for patent filed August 9, 1993. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/427,235, filed October 25, 1989, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007