Appeal No. 96-0023
Application 07/958,046
decided July 15, 1998).
Turning to the Examiner's rejection of claims 1 through 4
as being unpatentable over Hitchens, Thalimer, Nigawara and
Knoop, we fail to find that the references teach or suggest
selecting a stored history of underlying process attributes
for a plurality of points in time during the operation of a
process being
controlled, selecting a portion of the graphical
representation
and a point in time for which the underlying process
attributes for the history are displayed and displaying the
underlying process attributes of the selected portion of the
graphical
representation for the selected point in time, substantially
simultaneous with the display of the graphical representation.
Furthermore, we fail to find any suggestion by these
references to modify Hitchens to obtain Appellant's claimed
invention.
As shown above, the Examiner has not shown that Hitchens
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007