Ex parte RILEY - Page 11




          Appeal No. 96-0023                                                          
          Application 07/958,046                                                      


          or Thalimer teaches or suggests selecting a point of time for               
          displaying the historical attributes of a selected portion of               
          the graphical representation and displaying simultaneously the              
          selected underlying process attributes and the graphical                    
          representation.  Furthermore, we fail to find that Nigawara or              
          Knoop supply this missing teaching or suggestion.  In                       
          particular, neither Nigawara nor Knoop teaches or suggests a                
          selection of a point in time for which the underlying process               
          attributes from the history are to be displayed.                            









               We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1 through 5              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  Accordingly, the Examiner's decision                
          is reversed.                                                                
                                      Reversed                                        



                    KENNETH W. HAIRSTON          )                                    
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )                                    
                                         11                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007