THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TOSHIO KOYAMA, MICHIKO MOCHIZUKI,
KAYANO HASHIMOTO, and SATOSHI YAMAMOTO
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0139
Application 08/037,6831
______________
HEARD DECEMBER 8, 1998
_______________
Before THOMAS, MARTIN, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed March 25, 1993, as a
continuation of Application Serial No. 07/778,592, filed
October 17, 1991. Appellants claim the benefit under 35
U.S.C. § 119 of the following application:
P300284/90 Japan November 6, 1990
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007