THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT J. MAYERJAK
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0162
Application 08/030,8061
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 through 12 and 14-21, which are all
the claims pending in the application. Claim 13 has been
canceled. Appellant’s invention is directed to a flexible
1Application for patent filed March 12, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007