Ex parte MAYERJAK - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-0162                                                          
          Application 08/030,806                                                      

          coupling for connecting driving and driven rotary members.  Claim           
          1 is exemplary of the subject matter on appeal and recites:                 
                    1.  A flexible coupling for connecting driving and                
          driven rotary members the rotational axes of which may be                   
          slightly misaligned relative to one another, said coupling                  
          comprising a first connecting means for connecting said coupling            
          to said driving member, a second connecting means for connecting            
          said coupling to said driven member, and at least one rectangular           
          flex frame connected between said first connecting means and said           
          second connecting means, said at least one flex frame having four           
          legs consisting of two short legs generally identical and                   
          parallel to each other and two long legs longer than said short             
          legs which long legs are generally identical and parallel to each           
          other and generally perpendicular to said short legs, said legs             
          of said at least one flex frame having cross sections of such               
          dimensions that the stiffness of said coupling with respect to a            
          bending moment applied between said first connecting means and              
          said second connecting means in a plane containing said                     
          rotational axes of said driving and driven members is                       
          substantially uniform for all angles of said plane about said               
          rotational axis of said driving member.                                     
                                                                                     
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
                   The following references were relied on by the                    
          examiner:                                                                   
          Mayerjak                 3,481,158           Dec.  2, 1969                  
          Wirth                    4,392,837           Jul. 12, 1983                  

                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
                   Claims 1-6 and 18-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Wirth.                                     




                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007