Appeal No. 96-0196
Application 08/158,337
cited by the examiner, such prior art is not of record in this
case and, therefore, has not been considered by us.
With respect to each of the dependent claims, none of
the other applied references to Bendig, Tanielian, Hacker or
Tanaka overcomes the basic deficiencies of the Becker-Maeser
combination. Therefore, we do not sustain the rejection of
any of the dependent claims on appeal.
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 2-21 is
reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS
AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
RICHARD TORCZON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007