Appeal No. 96-1190
Application 07/950,177
sequence referred to by the examiner. Accordingly, we find
that Katsuyama does not anticipate claims 22-24. The
rejection of claims 22-24 is reversed.
As to the fourth limitation of claim 25, "displaying only
the characters representing numerals for human review and
storing signals representative of other characters without
human review," the examiner refers only to "figure 28 : 43"
(EA12). Element 43 in figure 28 is a display. Katsuyama
apparently displays all the characters for possible correction
in a correction mode (col. 23, lines 24-33). We find no
description of the selective displaying of only numerals as
recited in claim 25, nor does the examiner explain how such
limitation is disclosed by Katsuyama. Accordingly, we find
that Katsuyama does not anticipate claims 25 and 26. The
rejection of claims 25 and 26 is reversed.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 17-26 is reversed.
REVERSED
- 10 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007