Appeal No. 96-1323
Application 08/295,118
(Paper No. 10, mailed October 25, 1995) for the examiner's
reasoning in support of the rejections, and to appellant's
brief (Paper No. 9, filed October 3, 1995) for appellant's
arguments thereagainst.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have
given careful consideration to appellant's specification and
claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the
respective positions articulated by appellant and the
examiner. As a consequence of our review, we have made the
determination that the examiner's
rejection of claims 1 through 5 under § 102 is well founded
and will be sustained. We have also determined that the
examiner's rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1
through 5 are well founded and will likewise be sustained.
Our reasoning in support of these determinations follows.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007