Appeal No. 96-1323
Application 08/295,118
appeal, with the grooves formed in the bottom surface of the
tray of the combination having a somewhat more squared U-
shaped configuration.
To summarize:
We have affirmed the examiner's rejection of claims
1 through 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by
Hinds.
We have also affirmed the examiner's rejection of
claims 1 through 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Hinds in view of Todd, and the alternative rejection
based on Todd in view of Hinds.
The decision of the examiner is accordingly
affirmed.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007