THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SATOSHI ARAKAWA
__________
Appeal No. 96-1446
Application 08/103,1741
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed August 6, 1993.
According to appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/564,515, filed August 9, 1990.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007