Appeal No. 96-1457
Application No. 08/098,165
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 13 and 24
under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is affirmed. The
decision of the examiner rejecting claim 25 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) is affirmed. The decision of the examiner rejecting
claims 1 through 6, 8 through 10, 12, 14, 21 through 23 and 26
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed as to claims 21 through 23 and
26, and is reversed as to claims 1 through 6, 8 through 10, 12
and 14. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is
affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
R. Neil Sudol
COLEMAN & SUDOL
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007