THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte GENSHU FUSE and TAKASHI OHZONE
________________
Appeal No. 96-1536
Application 08/136,2411
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, METZ and JOHN D. SMITH,
Administrative Patent Judges.
METZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Application for reissue filed October 15, 1993.1
According to appellants, this Application is a Reissue of
Application 07/467,544 filed January 19, 1990, now Patent
Number 5,057,444, which issued on October 15, 1991, which is a
continuation of Application 07/191,788, now Patent No.
4,918,027 which issued on April 17, 1990, which is a
continuation of Application 06/836,514 filed March 5, 1986.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007