THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte BENJAMIN Y. MANADANAS, JAMES M. SKAGGS, SEAN P. O’SULLIVAN and CHRISTOPHER J. HEDIN __________ Appeal No. 96-1753 Application 08/063,2021 __________ HEARD: February 3, 1998 __________ Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claims 1 and 3 through 22, which constitute all of the claims remaining of record in the application. 1Application for patent filed May 18, 1993. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007